You may have read Austen's experience with attending an L Program. I thought that her experience sounded a bit, well, harrowing. But when I saw this clinic posted by The Fraser Equestrian Centre (a great place) and at Coveside (another great place. You may recall my posts on riding there on the trails) it was a no-brainer to sign up to audit.
|despite a night of torrential rain, the ring on Saturday was perfect|
But Teresa, I can hear you say, why didn't you sign up to ride in it?
Honestly, because at the time I had no idea where Carmen and I would be in terms of riding. I figured that I didn't need to throw a large chunk of money at a clinician to be told that bolting half-way through the test would impact my scores. This is also assuming that I would have been accepted anyway. Also, I knew that I would gain more by being able to focus on watching and listening and not having to care for a horse too.
Spoiler alert: it was awesome.
The format was as follows:
- Movement demo on the first day to show the upper level movements
-test rides: training through PSG.
The judge was Elizabeth McMullen (her qualifications include FEI 5*, EC/USEF Senior and FEI young horse dressage judge). She sounds intimidating. But I actually quite liked her: she had a dry sense of humour which I really enjoyed.
Each rider rode their test while the judge scored and commented over a sound system. Then there was time for a coaching session focusing on some key 'issues'. This was supposed to be with the rider's coach (if he/she was there). Often though, Lib (she likes to be called 'Lib', not 'Libby') couldn't resist and she would take it over and coach the rider.
|Lib coaching a rider|
Her comments were pointed but never mean. I liked her dry sense of humour. In one test a horse began to shake her head cantering down the long side and she commented 'needs more fly spray'. Another time a horse was quite enthusiastic in his canter departs. In reviewing the test Lib said 'he was dicking around in the canter depart. But you can't write 'dicking around' so you need to find a different way to say it'.
Everything always boiled down to the basics (doesn't it always?):
- don't throw away points by being inaccurate (clearly she had read my last post)
- the answer is almost always more leg
- unless it's more bend
- except in leg yield- people bend too much
- at home practice how much you can push so you know at a show- this related mostly to the free walk and lengthened/medium trots
- you keep a horse steady in the rein by being steady with the leg
- most people have too long reins: Lib had them shorten them and then leave the mouth alone
- more snaffle less curb
- transitions need to be clear. Judges hate fuzzy transitions- especially with lengthen to working gaits.
- in the free walk a swinging back is critical to a good mark
- ride the horse up to the bit don't use your hands
Not every rider had great rides. A couple horses had a bit of a melt down in the ring. Lib did not get on their case- instead she did her best to help them and to figure out what was causing the difficulty. A lot of time she urged the rider to be patient because the horse was trying to figure it out.
Every rider was given something to work on. Most of the times Lib was clear that there were no quick fixes (well except for being accurate). So she helped them to get things 'better' and then gave them some things to work on at home.
What was also great was how supportive the auditors were. Even though we were 'judging' and giving scores, everyone was on the side of the rider. During the coaching part, when a rider was successful (like with a good flying change) we all would cheer and clap.
I enjoyed the clinic so much and learned a ton. It was also lovely to not have to drive for 2 hours to audit a clinic. I took some of my learnings and put it to use in my ride Sunday afternoon. I shortened my reins and when Carmen sucked back put my leg on. It worked really well and I wasn't pulling any more.
I am profoundly grateful to all the people who signed up to be the riders. They really helped us learn. I hope that they got something out of it too.
I think it’s great learning to see from the outside sometimes. And yes, the people doing the work are very brave! Sounds like a perfect clinic for you to audit and enjoy.ReplyDelete
it was a great learning experience. I enjoyed it very much. Also, hanging out with all the dressage people was fun.Delete
Sounds like a great clinic! I like how positive she sounds. And this one is my favorite of your points:ReplyDelete
you keep a horse steady in the rein by being steady with the leg
I need to work on that one. A lot.
I think most of us need to work on that. It was a good reminder. I'm trying to recall it when she gets unsteady in her head.Delete
"The answer is almost always more leg... unless its more bend."ReplyDelete
Why is this my life.
It's all our lives. Especially mine.Delete
Sounds like a great clinic with a lot of good tips. She sounds like a fun lady. I like a trainer/judge with a sense of humor.ReplyDelete
I think that humour is a key ingredient in learning. At least for me.Delete
this sounds awesome!! lol at the "needs more fly spray" comment haha.... seriously tho i think this format has the potential to be FANTASTIC. or, uh, to be a completely and utter horror show lol. i guess it all kinda depends on the attitude and approach of the clinician. Lib sounds great tho!ReplyDelete
I agree with you 100% about the potential to be awesome or a disaster. It all comes down to the organizers and the clinician. Both did a great job.Delete
I went to something similar, but they didn't have the coaching afterwards. Plus they used horses and riders that were already near perfect so the comments didn't really apply to what I'm working on!ReplyDelete
This comment has been removed by the author.Delete
Perfection is lovely to watch but not always so great for learning when that's all you see.Delete
Wow! This clinic sounds AMAZING. Your notes are wonderful. Thank you so much for sharing.ReplyDelete
The dicking around part cracked me up a lot. I sort of wish judges COULD write that kind of thing in the notes because I'd appreciate it and get a good laugh.
I got so much out of it. I also wish the judge could write these things- it would make far more sense and add some levity.Delete
I always think its best to audit a clinician first before riding with them, and Lib sounds really good! If I were you, I'd definitely consider riding with her in the future!ReplyDelete
I agree with you. Sometimes it's not always possible because we don't have that many clinics here. Mostly because filling them is tough so it becomes a vicious cycle. I am thinking of riding with her. First i need to find out how much it costs.....Delete
WHAT? Irish is not an Arabian? I mean your blog doesn't focus the camera on him but I always thought he was. So...what is Irish?ReplyDelete
LOL, no! I even double checked his pedigree to make sure. He is actually a TB/QH cross.Delete